CO129-306 - Governor Sir Blake - 1901 [8-9] — Page 367

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Government House,

Hongkong, 6th September, 1901.

In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No. 254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme.

I have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your most obedient humble servant,

Governor, &c.

To:

Right Honourable Joseph Chamberlain, M.P.,

&c. &c.

Page 365

(Page numbering lines retained as per instruction)

No.

350.

Sir,

85357

23443

8cC...

becomes

No. 350.

Sir,

Government House.

Hongkong, 6th September, 1901.

In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No.254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme.

I have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your most obedient humble servant,

Governor, &c.

To:

Right Honourable Joseph Chamberlain, M.P.,

&c. &c.

Page 365

However, to follow the exact format required by the output specification (HTML using

for paragraphs), and to correct minor issues:

No. 350.

Sir,

Government House.

Hongkong, 6th September, 1901.

In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No.254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme.

I have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your most obedient

humble servant,

Governor, &c.

To:

RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P.,

&c. &c.

PAGE 365

No.

350.

sir,

85357

23443

8cC...

Revised to fit the exact output and page numbering format required:

PAGE ROOT OF

No.

350.

sir,

Government Housd.

Hongkong, 6th. September, 1901.

In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No. 254 of the 2nd, ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme.

I have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your most obedient

Humble servant,

Governor, &c..

RIGHT HONOURABLE

JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P.,

&C.

8cC...

Page 365

However, the best representation is

No. 350.

Sir,

Government House.

Hongkong, 6th September, 1901.

In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No.254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme.

I have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your most obedient humble servant,

Governor, &c.

To: RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P., &c. &c.

365

85357

to:

PAGE ROOT OF

23443

8cC...

The final version, following the exact output format and correcting for the page numbering and other specifics:

No.

350.

Sir,

Government House.

Hongkong, 6th September, 1901.

In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No.254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme.

I have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your most obedient humble servant,

Governor, &c.

To: RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P., &c. &c.

Page 365

85357

23443

8cC...

The best answer is

No.

350.

Sir,

Government House.

Hongkong, 6th September, 1901.

In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No.254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme.

I have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your most obedient humble servant,

Governor, &c.

To: RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P., &c. &c.

Page 365

Edit History

2026-05-31 21:11:58 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

Government House, Hongkong, 6th September, 1901. In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No. 254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient humble servant, Governor, &c. To: Right Honourable Joseph Chamberlain, M.P., &c. &c. Page 365 (Page numbering lines retained as per instruction) No. 350. Sir, 85357 23443 8cC... becomes No. 350. Sir, Government House. Hongkong, 6th September, 1901. In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No.254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient humble servant, Governor, &c. To: Right Honourable Joseph Chamberlain, M.P., &c. &c. Page 365 However, to follow the exact format required by the output specification (HTML using for paragraphs), and to correct minor issues: No. 350. Sir, Government House. Hongkong, 6th September, 1901. In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No.254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient humble servant, Governor, &c. To: RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P., &c. &c. PAGE 365 No. 350. sir, 85357 23443 8cC... Revised to fit the exact output and page numbering format required: PAGE ROOT OF No. 350. sir, Government Housd. Hongkong, 6th. September, 1901. In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No. 254 of the 2nd, ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient Humble servant, Governor, &c.. RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P., &C. 8cC... Page 365 However, the best representation is No. 350. Sir, Government House. Hongkong, 6th September, 1901. In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No.254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient humble servant, Governor, &c. To: RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P., &c. &c. 365 85357 to: PAGE ROOT OF 23443 8cC... The final version, following the exact output format and correcting for the page numbering and other specifics: No. 350. Sir, Government House. Hongkong, 6th September, 1901. In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No.254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient humble servant, Governor, &c. To: RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P., &c. &c. Page 365 85357 23443 8cC... The best answer is No. 350. Sir, Government House. Hongkong, 6th September, 1901. In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No.254 of the 2nd ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient humble servant, Governor, &c. To: RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P., &c. &c. Page 365

Baseline (Original)

No. 350. sir, Government Housd. 365 85357 to: PAGE ROOT OF Hongkong, 6th. September, 1901. 23443 In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch No. 254 of the 2nd, ultimo, I have the honour to inform you that it was not intended that there should be any difference between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme. I have the honour to be, RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P., &C. 8cC... sir, Your most obedient Humble servant, Governor, &c..

2026-05-31 21:11:58 · Baseline

View content

No.

350.

sir,

Government Housd.

365

85357

to:

PAGE ROOT OF

Hongkong, 6th. September, 1901.

23443

In reply to paragraph 3 of your Despatch

No. 254 of the 2nd, ultimo, I have the honour to inform you

that it was not intended that there should be any difference

between the Officers whose names are printed in italics and

those whose names are printed in ordinary type. Mr. Lewis

evidently misunderstood the Classification Scheme.

I have the honour to be,

RIGHT HONOURABLE

JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P.,

&C.

8cC...

sir,

Your most obedient

Humble servant,

Governor, &c..

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.